Rod Rosenstein Protests – WSJ

0
115
DOWNLOAD THE APP



Rod Rosenstein

this week invoked an unusual defense to explain his slow-walking of documents to Congress. “They should understand by now that the Department of Justice is not going to be extorted,”

Mr. Rosenstein

said. “We’re going to do what’s required by the rule of law, and any kind of threats that anybody makes are not going to affect the way we do our job.”

The deputy attorney general was reacting to reports that some Republicans are drafting articles of impeachment against him if he doesn’t comply with subpoenas. His choice of the word “extorted” is illuminating. Mr.

Rosenstein

is right to say Justice and FBI aren’t obliged to “just open our doors to allow Congress to come and rummage through the files.”

But that isn’t happening here. In the cases at hand, Congress is acting through its committees as a separate and co-equal branch of government—the branch that funds Justice and has the right and obligation to exercise oversight. Congress is making specific requests regarding specific questions and documents.

As for the articles of impeachment, these too are expressions of Congress’s power. The practical worth of contempt and impeachment actions is less about removing an official from power than leverage to encourage cooperation. We had a demonstration of how this works in January, when Mr. Rosenstein and the new FBI director,

Christopher Wray,

tried to make an end run around the House Intelligence Committee’s subpoenas for information about the

Steele

dossier on

Donald Trump.

Only when Speaker

Paul Ryan

said Congress would hold them in contempt if they didn’t comply did they turn over the documents.

Mr. Rosenstein’s irritation might be warranted if the documents produced so far demonstrated that Congress’s demands were frivolous or imperiled national security. But remember how Justice warned the Intelligence Committee that making public its report on FISA warrants would be “extraordinarily reckless”? Instead, it provided the public with welcome (but still incomplete) insight about what went down in the 2016 election.

READ  How the SEC Stops Short Sellers From Keeping Markets Honest

Or take the recently released memos written by then-FBI director

James Comey

to “memorialize” his private conversations with Donald Trump. We can see why

Mr. Comey

might not want it known that he assured

Mr. Trump

he didn’t leak or “do weasel things.” Now that everyone’s seen the memos, it’s clear nothing in them justifies the stonewalling before they were turned over to Congress.

Mr. Rosenstein’s complaint comes as Congress is involved in a similar tussle over the intelligence community’s redactions in the House Intelligence Committee’s report on Russia. In particular there is a battle over the redacted material on pages 53 and 54, which speaks to what FBI agents thought of former national security adviser

Michael Flynn’s

statements about his interactions with Russia.

Rep. Trey Gowdy

(R., S.C.) has said that Mr. Comey told Congress that the FBI agents who interviewed

Mr. Flynn

didn’t believe he was lying. But on his book tour, Mr. Comey has denied saying this. The American people deserve to know who is telling the truth.

Justice can legitimately withhold information from Congress that might jeopardize specific criminal cases. But that doesn’t seem relevant here. We don’t want to see Mr. Rosenstein fired or impeached, but he and the FBI need to recognize Congress’s constitutional authority.

Appeared in the May 3, 2018, print edition.



Source link

GET ACCESS TO FREE TRAINING NOW

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here